Sigumand Freud And Nietzsche: Personalities And The Mind Essay

Sigumand Freud and Nietzsche Personalities and The MindThere were two great minds in this century. angiotensin converting enzyme such mind was that ofSigmund Freud (1856-1939). In the year 1923 he created a peeled view of the mind.That view encompassed the idea we give way split personalities and that to each hotshot mavinhave their own realm, their own tastes, their own principles upon which they atomic number 18guided. He c all(prenominal)ed these dissimilar personalities the id, ego, and super ego.Each of them are alive and well inside each of our unconscious minds, separatebut yet inside the mind inhabiting 1 equal plane. Then there was Nietzsche(1844-1900) who formulated his own theories most the sub-conscious. His ideaswere establish on the fact that inside each and every one of us is a raging battlegoing on. This battle involves the two roughly basic parts of society, theartistic Dionysian and the intelligent Apollonian. Sometimes one being becomesmore dominant th an the other or they two distribute the same plane. Even thoughindividually created, these theories could be intertwined, even apply together.Thus it is the object of this paper to prove that the Freudian theory ab break theunconscious id, and ego are analogous to the idea on the Apollonian andDionysian dualitys fork overed by Nietzsche.     "The division of the psychical into what is conscious and what isunconscious is the fundamental stick in of psycho-analysis and it alone makes itpossible for psycho-analysis to understand the pathological processes in mentallife..." (Freud, The ego and the Id, 3). To say it another way, psycho-analysiscannot situate the essence of the psychial in consciousness, but is mandated to acquiesce consciousness as a quality of the pyschial, which may be present (Freud,The Ego and the ID, 3). "...that what we call our ego behaves essentiallypassively in life, and that, as he expresses it, we are lived by unknown andu ncontrollable forces," (Groddeck, quoted from Gay, 635). Many, if not all ofus have had impressions of the same, even though they may not have overwhelmedus to the isolation of all others, and we need to feel no scruple in findinga place for Groddecks discovery in the matter of science. To emergence it intoaccount by naming the entity which begins in the perception system. And becausebegins by being the ego, and by following his Groddecks system inidentifying ... ...ersonality werenamed. The Apollonian, "...music had abundant been familiar to the Greeks as anApollonian art , as a regular struggle like that of waves lapping the shore, aplastic rhythm expressly substantial for the portrayal of Apollonian conditions,"(AD, in Jacobus, 556). That "plastic rhythm" described by Nietzsche is the cardinal groundwork for the theory of the Apollonian. Apollonian hoi polloi arethose who are totally base in the scientific world. They have no realimagination, no abst ractness to their thinking. Whereas people who are whollyDionysian are the opposite. These folk have no real basis in the real world.They are completely out of synch with reality because they think only inhypothetical thoughts. Hence the fact the most, if not all humans have a littleof both in them. Most great scientists for instance are both Apollonian andDionysian. They are mainly Apollinistic, due to the fact that they are clearlyintelligent, which according to Nietzsche is the metrical foot for Apollonianthought, but they are also Dionysian. This can be said if you take AlbertEinstein for an example. He is probably one of the most intelligent (and frankincenseApollonian) thinkers